Play Online Poker
Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
  1.  
    Dude, this movies is freaking amazing!!! I need to go see it again in the IMAX theater this time!! Im really bummed Heath Ledger wont be in a future movies in the series. I am willing to bet he wins an oscar.

    My only complaint: the new Rachael is hideous. She cant act and she is uglier than sin!! Her face is all puffy like a cabbage patch doll, and everytime I had to endure her on the screen, I just kept asking myself "WHY is she ruining this great movie!!" Well she didnt ruin it, she couldnt even possibly. But I was gald she blew up!!!
    •  
      CommentAuthorKodachi
    • CommentTimeJul 21st 2008
     
    I do agree that the new Rachael is really really ugly. I did wish they could have had Katie Holmes back for this movie but Tom Cruise screwed that up...litterally. It would have made more sence.

    I also agree that the movie was excellent. Every one should go see this movie even if they are not a Batman fan.
    • CommentAuthorhlysheet
    • CommentTimeJul 22nd 2008
     
    XFiles baby. My prediction is Surprise hit of the summer
  2.  
    Posted By: hlysheetXFiles baby. My prediction is Surprise hit of the summer


    The X Files is soooo over man!!
    •  
      CommentAuthorareaman
    • CommentTimeJul 22nd 2008
     
    frank obv lives in 1998.
    • CommentAuthorhlysheet
    • CommentTimeJul 22nd 2008
     
    Posted By: areamanfrank obv lives in 1998.
    Ummmmmmmmm wasnt Batman created in like the 40's? Wasnt the original Batman movie released in like 1968? Any Batman movie without Adam West and Burt Ward is a fraud. This movie will bring back interest in the XFiles just like the stupid Micheal Keaton movie did for Batman. I mean wtf else has David Dochovney Chris Carter and Gillian Anderson been doing since the show ended?
    • CommentAuthorBVI
    • CommentTimeJul 23rd 2008
     
    I loved X-files back in the day, but this Dark Knight picture is something to behold.

    And I didn't mind Maggie Gynellhall (sp?) as the new Rachel. Yeah, Katie Holmes is hotter...but then again Katie Holmes is also a horrible actress, and did way more to ruin the first one (although it was not ruined, and ultimately very good as well) than Maggie did hear. I mean, there are hot chicks in every movie. Do we really need every chick ever to be smokin' hot? (don't answer that) I mean I'm not crazy about her as an actress, but it didn't bother me. F Katie Holmes, she's fucking horrible.

    But yes, I think Christian Bale is the best Batman ever (Michael Keaton a close second) and somehow Heath Ledger managed to not only out perform Jack Nicholson's Joker, but he managed to go so far above and beyond it. Heath is the story here, there's no doubt. Amazing performance that deserves...something. Holy crap. HIs performance is very comic booky, but yet routed in some very real world shit.

    This is practically the perfect summer blockbuster. The X-files cannot be this good, although I think I will enjoy it too.
    •  
      CommentAuthorareaman
    • CommentTimeJul 23rd 2008
     
    god damn you all, i must see this film immediatley...or tonight.
  3.  
    No Country for Old Men had absolutely no ending, and ruined the movie on a whole for me. But the great part of the movie was the villain. Didnt he win an oscar for that? But anyway, my point is, when i saw it, i was thinking, man, that is what a villain is. Boy, after watching Heath ledger in this movie, i feel really dumb for feeling that way!! I had no idea what a villain COULD BE. Now I know. A brilliant performance!! I plan to watch this a few more time before it leaves theaters!!

    BTW, Heath's performance over shadows Christians Bale, who also had a great performance.

    The movie was damn near perfect, except ....

    And Ben, I dont need anyone hot to be Rachael, or be Bruce Waynes life-long love, (although they should be, this is bruce 'freaking' wayne!!) But I do need someone that I dont cringe at everytime they put her on the screen. I kept thinking, if this is what she looks like after movie makeup, and cant imagine catching her out of the shower!! maybe this was the result of some freak comestic surgery gone wrong. She could have been a villain herself!! And Katie Holmes is no actor, but neither is the stay puft face actress they replaced her with!
  4.  
    Posted By: hlysheet
    Posted By: areamanfrank obv lives in 1998.
    Ummmmmmmmm wasnt Batman created in like the 40's? Wasnt the original Batman movie released in like 1968? Any Batman movie without Adam West and Burt Ward is a fraud. This movie will bring back interest in the XFiles just like the stupid Micheal Keaton movie did for Batman. I mean wtf else has David Dochovney Chris Carter and Gillian Anderson been doing since the show ended?



    Please don't ever compare the batman franchise to X files!!! Even in its heyday, i found X Files to be gimmicking. The gimmicks are wearing off. I dont BELIEVE!! Unless we are talking Journeys, "Don't stop believing!" Cuz that rings in my head everytime i think of my Whitesox world series!!

    I hate Gillian Anderson. I find her character hard to "BELIEVE". Is she really going to be the SKEPTIC STILL! Ugh shoot me in the head!!
Play Online Poker
 

Web Development and Hosting by LJ Host