Play Online Poker
Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    •  
      CommentAuthorareaman
    • CommentTimeMay 8th 2008
     
    not the river

    durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    forget it.
  1.  
    I dont think whether the shove is on the flop or the river changes the decision. The correct decision is to fold. If you follow the thread, i implied the correct decision was a fold, but called knowing i was beat. Whether i had to make that decision on the flop or the river matters little in this case. I dont think the player in the hand played it badly, He could have hoped i put him on a straight draw with that flop. Smooth calling me from position on the flop is the play i would have made with his hand (9-8). He also had the intial raiser to act behind him on the flop. He played it well, I played it very badly.

    I dont think most players will shove the flop with 10s or Js. Maybe online they do, not in the live games i play. Qs are unlikey as that is most likely being raised pre-flop. Aces are more likely than queens. But i assume a solid player raises with aces in this scenario pre-flop as well, hoping to get it all in with a big pair pre-flop. Not to mention Aces have me beat. There is no way i can "logically" justify calling a shove on the flop or river, unless he was very short stacked.
    •  
      CommentAuthorareaman
    • CommentTimeMay 8th 2008 edited
     
    his range on the flop is much wider than on the river when he takes you to value town

    it does include oesd draws and TT+, especially if youre going to fold kings EVER, because it makes you extremely EXPLOITABLE

    scuba folds...maybe 50% of the time to a shove here...im shipping oesd after your raise.....you have to have a 9 or 88 to call me? SHIP, watch you fold...then laugh with glee as i show you trash.
    •  
      CommentAuthorareaman
    • CommentTimeMay 8th 2008 edited
     
    you decide to trap with kings, fine...dandy...so you raise the flop and expect him to felt TT-QQ? or what? i dont understand why youre raising the flop. protecting yourself from 3 outs? youre either, ahead or behind...i dont know why raising gives you value out of the hands youre ahead? with a guy behind you? i dont get it.
    • CommentAuthorBVI
    • CommentTimeMay 9th 2008 edited
     
    Let's say the guy pushes instead of over calls...

    Areaman, I definitely agree that the range on the flop is broader here than it is on the river for our villain. And Scuba's statement that it doesn't matter whether it was the flop or the river I think is a little off base. People like getting their money in on the flop when they don't really know what's going on in the hand. It's like in baseball when the tie always goes to the runner, but in the brain of some poker players, when they are split between whether or not they are winning or losing on the flop...the answer is shove, whereas on the river, in the same poker players mind...the debate is between calling and folding. But river raising is a topic for another day I'd say. But just the same, some of that depends on what kind of player he is too. But yeah, the third raise on this flop at the stakes we typically play though...I think it means a huge hand.

    But let's get back to how the hand actually played out...

    In Scuba's defense though, I don't think there's anything wrong with raising the flop. Tens thru Queens are possible here for the original raiser and he gets put in a tough spot here. Even an aggressive player that knows that Scuba is not straightforward by any means might think of making a play with a hand like 7/7 or any two cards if Scuba puts in a raise. Someone might go bonkers with A/K thinking even if his bluff does not work, he has 6 live outs. I think there is value to be had in raising here in a lot of situations (if the original raiser is tilting being one of them that sticks out in my mind). This is poker, you know that game where every idiot under the sun is ready to put in every dollar he has drawing to two goddamn outs? We play this game all the time. There is plenty of value to raising when you are ahead. It's also possible that the player behind you (seeing as he was the 2nd person to call the raise getting a discount) has a less than stellar hand that hasn't made it home yet (a straight draw of some kind), and that's not the hand you want to be up against here, we'd rather isolate against the original raiser, who almost all of the time we are going to have the best hand against by the river. But what do you do, Areaman, if you have two queens and Scuba raises you on this board? It's not an automatic decision, and if it is...well, I think you know how bad that is. Hell if I have an overpair and Scuba raises this flop, the hand gets really damn interesting, and it probably plays out different ways depending on a lot of variables. Some of the time I probably lose a decent sized pot depending on the scenario. Granted the knowledge that he doesn't like to slowplay may make a laydown easier on a board like this, but still. Let's say he doesn't raise the flop. Let's say he just cold calls the flop bet, and there's a second call behind, as it seems obvious by now that's how it would have played out judging by the over obvious smooth overcall...in a game where you don't know the guy behind you, that call could mean a lot of things. Maybe he's a bad player with an 8, maybe even Q/J...Christ who knows anymore, maybe it's a tricky player with air. It also sets you up to be able to be bluffed on the river some of the times you are ahead, and it might make you pay off some of the times you are beat. Here, Scuba got his information that he was beat, he just didn't follow through with it, and yeah I'm guilty of that too. A raise helps you make the best possible decision a lot of the time, in my opinion. But that's just me, and I'm sure there are excellent counter points to be made for playing it both ways on the flop, that's what makes this game fun.

    A smooth call is not a bad play in this spot by any means though, at least not in my opinion. I don't have any problem with your analysis of the hand in a lot of ways Area, I think a deceptive smooth call here most of the time gets you heads up with a hand that no one is really going to put you on. I think it's probably fine to play it either way, I just don't understand why you don't "get" the flop raise.

    And I'm going to bed.

    Dozo, I figure you're going to read this at work...why don't you throw a long winded post in here too just for the hell of it?
    •  
      CommentAuthorareaman
    • CommentTimeMay 9th 2008 edited
     
    899 is an interesting board, if i get raised on it in a live game, i strongly consider folding AA-TT if i respect that persons ability and dont think they are an absolute drooler. and i honestly cant imagine how someone can raise in the position scuba is in with someone left to act without having a 9, or 88.

    what is scubas raising range on the 899 board after i raised UTG and fired into two people? if im sitting there with queens i have to think...well...?
    hes really raising me with 77, TT or JJ? if so...he plays bad, much worse than i thought. with people left to act behind him? if he wants to peel one and see if i double barrell fine, but raising is terrible imo, the guy behind him can do any number of things. he should take his position into account. which isnt what he did here...which is why i think raising that flop is bad. the only hand hes getting action from behind him is a hand thats absolutely crushing him. the guy that had 12 dollars invested, and now all of the sudden has 75? way to set the bear trap!

    i dont know why youd take the line you did with kings, waiting until you are beat to get the majority of your money in. reraise preflop, it seems like the utg raiser has a hand or you wouldnt have taken this line with kings, i assume you think he is fairly tight from utg, so you really want to trap him? make it 40 preflop, and check the flop, then youre getting paid for sure. i dont know whyd youd invite others into the pot with KK, its as good as limping with it in the position youre in.

    the flop raise is simple for me
    if youre playing good straight forward players...youre not getting called by a hand that you can beat ON THAT BOARD. if the board is 9-3-3 i think its an entirely different story, because QQ isnt likely to fold here. when the board pairs cards 77-AA, the "popular" cards, you have to proceed with much more caution imo.
    • CommentAuthordozo5
    • CommentTimeMay 9th 2008 edited
     
    There's already been a lot of good things said about this hand by multiple posters, but I'll attempt to throw in my .02 per request of BVI, as tonight is BVI Night #2 so it's all about him :)

    After reading all the responses the first thing I want to say is that this hand, just like most others, isn't black and white, and thinking that it is really just shows a lack of understanding of poker theory and for the game of poker in general. I know it's cheesy,but "In no limit texas hold 'em, we vary our play." Do I particularily like the smooth call with KK? No, but I understand what Scuba's trying to do here, especially being in postion in what is currently just a heads up pot. Maybe Scuba had a read that the blinds were tight and there was a good chance the pot was going to be heads up or 3 handed at most, and being in the cut-off I don't mind just smooth calling here in order to disguise your hand and win a big pot on the right board.

    However, when a board comes like this I think you have to be willing to just get rid of your hand. When you get cold called by the third player in the hand where there's a raise and reraise on the flop, I think you basically need to just give up unless you hit a k, depending on who the player is. While I agree that this players range is much wider on the flop, most players in that game don't have the capability of firing on the river with a busted draw and/or a hand like 10's or even J's.

    I don't mind your raise on the flop, though I'm not ecstatic about it either. By raising, you're building a rather large pot without having any idea where you are in the hand, and while this raise may be to gather some information about your opponents holdings, it's costing you much more to do now than it would have to do it before the flop. With an opponent behind you, you're basically only getting called by a hand that beats you, except for possibly a hand like QQ or JJ, maybe 10's, but I don't think the 3rd opponent in the hand calls with the later two hands, so in essence you're turning your hand into a bluff. By just calling, you may be allowing a player to make a draw such as J10, or you may be losing a bit of value from QQ or JJ, but you're also risking less on a somewhat scary board that you decided to try and trap on. Sometimes when you trap, you trap yourself, and I think the key thing to understand here is that you only had 12 invested, and that going nuts with just one pair here is kind of spewy.

    I think the line I would have taken had I choosen to play KK that way preflop would probably be similar to yours, though I really don't ever flat in the CO with KK. I think just calling the flop and seeing what happens on the turn is the best line, as you're basically only getting your raise called by hands that are beating you, so either way ahead or way behind. And with only 12 invested, theres no reason to lose a lot of chips, if somebody makes a play on you with a busted draw or something, good for them, but there's so many better spots in that game to get your money in, where you can be certain that you're ahead.

    The board is the key in this spot, you tried to trap and got a board which really isnt the best to trap on. If the board was Q 6 2 or something like that then it's a different story, but in this spot theres no reason to go nuts with one pair where your edge in that game is higher than your perceived equity in this hand.
    •  
      CommentAuthorareaman
    • CommentTimeMay 9th 2008 edited
     
    i dont know why you think i think its black and white

    i actually stated that the texture of the board depends if i raise or call...

    so you can get fucked, since i am 100% thats directed at me.
    •  
      CommentAuthorareaman
    • CommentTimeMay 9th 2008 edited
     
    im not saying TT-AA is an autofold on that flop if the pot was headsup, but i certainly think its close.
    i would go with my read and raise if was oop or fold, the pot size is getting out of hand and you have no way to control it, youre oop on a scary board. if you just call and he fires 150 on the turn, then what? call again and hope he doesnt fire the river? you really have to plan ahead here or youre going to the felt.
  2.  
    [sucks in a lot of air]

    I think raising the flop or smooth calling is not really a big deal you can do it either way. When you smooth call I presume the guy behind you smooth calls as well so you dont know much more about his hand. If you raise and you get smooth called behind you. You have to error on the side of being beat and try to keep the pot small as possible from that point forward. When your trapping someone the whole point is to build a pot. By raising the flop all that happend was you isolate yourself in a big pot with a guy that probly has you beat oop. Say you would have raised and they both folded then your trap was for nothing and you stand to lose alot more. The guy who smooth called played the hand terrible and basicly said "hey dude I either have a 9 88 or im being really fucking stubborn with tens, but youve got about 20% of my range beat lets do it in the but" I would hope a brick peeled off on the turn then hope the or puts one more bet in before I did anything but thats not the only way you can play the hand. However since thats the way you were intending from the outset you shoulda stuck with your plan and kept the trap on. If you smooth call and the original raiser shuts down and you put like a half pot bet in and then guy behind you moves in you can be pretty certain your cooked. Where I thinks stubborn overpair player would just smoothcall again or he would moved the flop. Where as a 9 would think you were commited and move in.
Play Online Poker
 

Web Development and Hosting by LJ Host